Ashe P.C. - Intellectual Property Agreements - Ex Parte Reexamination

Ex Parte Reexamination

ASHE, P.C.
11440 Isaac Newton Square North
Suite 210
Reston, VA 20190
Tel: 703-467-9001
Fax: 703-467-9002
info@ashepc.com

Ex Parte Reexamination

            Ex  parte reexamination procedures permit a patent owner or any third party to request reexamination of a patent.  Once initiated, the requestor does not participate in the reexamination process. 

Basics

Basic characteristics of ex parte reexamination

The basic characteristics of ex parte reexamination are as follows:

(A) Anyone can request reexamination at any time during the period of enforceability of the patent;

(B) Prior art considered during reexamination is limited to prior art patents or printed publications applied under the appropriate parts of 35 U.S.C. §102 and §103;

(C) A substantial new question of patentability must be present for reexamination to be ordered;

(D) If ordered, the actual reexamination proceeding is ex parte in nature;

(E) Decision on the request must be made no later than 3 months from its filing, and the remainder of proceedings must proceed with "special dispatch" within the Office;

(F) If ordered, a reexamination proceeding will normally be conducted to its conclusion and the issuance of a reexamination certificate;

(G) The scope of a claim cannot be enlarged by amendment;

(H) All reexamination and patent files are open to the public, but see paragraph (I) below;

(I) The reexamination file is scanned into IFW to provide an electronic format copy of the file. All public access to and copying of the reexamination file may be made from the electronic format copy available through PAIR. Any remaining paper files are not available to the public.

[MPEP 2209 (July 2008)]

Return to Top

Statistics

Return to Top

Statutes

35 U.S.C. §301 - Citation of prior art

Any person at any time may cite to the Office in writing prior art consisting of patents or printed publications which that person believes to have a bearing on the patentability of any claim of a particular patent. If the person explains in writing the pertinency and manner of applying such prior art to at least one claim of the patent, the citation of such prior art and the explanation thereof will become a part of the official file of the patent. At the written request of the person citing the prior art, his or her identity will be excluded from the patent file and kept confidential.

35 U.S.C. §302 - Request for reexamination

Any person at any time may file a request for reexamination by the Office of any claim of a patent on the basis of any prior art cited under the provisions of section 301 of this title. The request must be in writing and must be accompanied by payment of a reexamination fee established by the Director pursuant to the provisions of section 41 of this title. The request must set forth the pertinency and manner of applying cited prior art to every claim for which reexamination is requested. Unless the requesting person is the owner of the patent, the Director promptly will send a copy of the request to the owner of record of the patent.

35 U.S.C. §303 - Determination of issue by Director

(a) Within three months following the filing of a request for reexamination under the provisions of section 302 of this title, the Director will determine whether a substantial new question of patentability affecting any claim of the patent concerned is raised by the request, with or without consideration of other patents or printed publications. On his own initiative, and any time, the Director may determine whether a substantial new question of patentability is raised by patents and publications discovered by him or cited under the provisions of section 301 of this title. The existence of a substantial new question of patentability is not precluded by the fact that a patent or printed publication was previously cited by or to the Office or considered by the Office.

(b) A record of the Director’s determination under subsection (a) of this section will be placed in the official file of the patent, and a copy promptly will be given or mailed to the owner of record of the patent and to the person requesting reexamination, if any.

(c) A determination by the Director pursuant to subsection (a) of this section that no substantial new question of patentability has been raised will be final and nonappealable. Upon such a determination, the Director may refund a portion of the reexamination fee required under section 302 of this title.

35 U.S.C. §304 - Reexamination order by Director

If, in a determination made under the provisions of subsection 303(a) of this title, the Director finds that a substantial new question of patentability affecting any claim of a patent is raised, the determination will include an order for reexamination of the patent for resolution of the question. The patent owner will be given a reasonable period, not less than two months from the date a copy of the determination is given or mailed to him, within which he may file a statement on such question, including any amendment to his patent and new claim or claims he may wish to propose, for consideration in the reexamination. If the patent owner files such a statement, he promptly will serve a copy of it on the person who has requested reexamination under the provisions of section 302 of this title. Within a period of two months from the date of service, that person may file and have considered in the reexamination a reply to any statement filed by the patent owner. That person promptly will serve on the patent owner a copy of any reply filed.

35 U.S.C. §305 - Conduct of reexamination proceedings

After the times for filing the statement and reply provided for by section 304 of this title have expired, reexamination will be conducted according to the procedures established for initial examination under the provisions of sections 132 and 133 of this title. In any reexamination proceeding under this chapter, the patent owner will be permitted to propose any amendment to his patent and a new claim or claims thereto, in order to distinguish the invention as claimed from the prior art cited under the provisions of section 301of this title, or in response to a decision adverse to the patentability of a claim of a patent. No proposed amended or new claim enlarging the scope of a claim of the patent will be permitted in a reexamination proceeding under this chapter. All reexamination proceedings under this section, including any appeal to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, will be conducted with special dispatch within the Office.

35 U.S.C. §306 - Appeal

The patent owner involved in a reexamination proceeding under this chapter may appeal under the provisions of section 134 of this title, and may seek court review under the provisions of sections 141 to 145 of this title, with respect to any decision adverse to the patentability of any original or proposed amended or new claim of the patent.

35 U.S.C. §307 - Certificate of patentability, unpatentability, and claim cancellation

(a) In a reexamination proceeding under this chapter, when the time for appeal has expired or any appeal proceeding has terminated, the Director will issue and publish a certificate canceling any claim of the patent finally determined to be unpatentable, confirming any claim of the patent determined to be patentable, and incorporating in the patent any proposed amended or new claim determined to be patentable.

(b) Any proposed amended or new claim determined to be patentable and incorporated into a patent following a reexamination proceeding will have the same effect as that specified in section 252 of this title for reissued patents on the right of any person who made, purchased, or used within the United States, or imported into the United States, anything patented by such proposed amended or new claim, or who made substantial preparation for the same, prior to issuance of a certificate under the provisions of subsection (a) of this section.

Return to Top

Ex Parte Reexamination Rules

Subpart D - Ex Parte Reexamination of Patents (37 C.F.R. §§ 1.501-1.502, 1.510, 1. 515, 1.520, 1.525, 1.530, 1.535, 1.540, 1.550, 1.552, 1.555, 1.560, 1.565, and 1.570)

Recently Reported Requests for Ex Parte Reexamination

D. 507,466

  • Title: WRENCH
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/010,686
  • Requested Date: Oct. 29, 2009
  • Owners of Record: Bobby Hu, Taiwan
  • Requester: Brian M. McInnis, Hong Kong 

No. 4,965,825

  • Title: SIGNAL PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHODS
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/010,709
  • Requested Date: Oct. 5, 2009
  • Owners of Record: The Personalized Mass Media Corporation, New York, NY
  • Requester: Bruce H. Stoner, Jr., Greenblum & Bernstein, PLC., Reston, VA 

No. 5,459,522

  • Title: METHOD FOR ACQUISITION AND DISPLAY OF AN ON-SCREEN PROGRAM GUIDE
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/009,577
  • Requested Date: Oct. 30, 2009
  • Owners of Record: LG Electronics, Inc., Seoul, Korea
  • Requester: Troy M. Schmeizer, Hogan & Hartson, LLP., Los Angeles, CA 

No. 5,467,002

  • Title: ADJUSTABLE CHAIR HAVING PROGRAMMABLE CONTROL SWITCHES
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/009,608
  • Requested Date: Oct. 16, 2009
  • Owners of Record: Reliance Medical Products, Inc., Mason, OH
  • Requester: Medical Technologies, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT 

No. 6,371,637

  • Title: COMPACT, FLEXIBLE, LED ARRAY
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/009,611
  • Requested Date: Nov. 2, 2009
  • Owners of Record: Geoffrey P. Atchinson, Irvine, CA, Mitchell A. Valentine, Irvine, CA
  • Requester: Daniel P. Homiller, Coats & Bennett, PLLC., Raleigh, NC    

No. 6,403,027

  • Title: METHOD FOR FUMIGATING PERISHABLES WITHIN A REFRIGERATED CARGO CONTAINER
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/009,571
  • Requested Date: Oct. 30, 2009
  • Owners of Record: Structural Tenting Corporation, Miami, FL
  • Requester: The Termite Doctor, LLC., Miami, FL 

No. 6,716,895

  • Title: POLYMER COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING COLLOIDS OF SILVER SALTS
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/010,714
  • Requested Date: Oct. 13, 2009
  • Owners of Record: C.R., Bard, Inc., Murray Hill, NJ
  • Requester: Covidien, Mansfield, MA, Tracy W. Druce, Novak Druce & Quigg, LLP., Houston, TX 

No. 6,740,855

  • Title: PROGRAMMABLE SLOW-COOKER APPLIANCE
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/010,715
  • Requested Date: Oct. 13, 2009
  • Owners of Record: Sunbeam Products, Inc., Boca Raton, FL
  • Requester: Gregory M. Hasley, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP., Houston, TX 

No. 7,013,284

  • Title: COMPONENT BASED INTERFACE TO HANDLE TASKS DURING CLAIMPROCESSING
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/010,713
  • Requested Date: Oct. 9, 2009
  • Owners of Record: Accenture, LLP., Palo Alto, CA
  • Requester: Guidewire Software, Inc., San Mateo, CA 

No. 7,193,508

  • Title: PORTABLE SECURITY SYSTEM
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/010,707
  • Requested Date: Oct. 9, 2009
  • Owners of Record: Cameras Onsite, LLC., Houston, TX
  • Requester: Ronald J. Koch, Columbus, OH 

No. 7,232,197

  • Title: FIRE-SAFE ELECTRONIC DATA STORAGE PROTECTION DEVICE
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/009,558
  • Requested Date: Oct. 29, 2009
  • Owners of Record: William P. Davis, Roselle, IL
  • Requester: James M. Francis, Stoll Keenon Ogden, PLLC., Lexington, KY

No. 7,345,312

  • Title: SOLID-STATE LIGHT SOURCE
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/010,678
  • Requested Date: Oct. 15. 2009
  • Owners of Record: Smith & Nephew, Inc., Memphis, TN
  • Requester: Grant J. Scott, Esq., Myers Bigel Sibley & Sajovec, PA., Raleigh, NC 

No. 7,563,979

  • Title: PROTECTIVE CABLE CHUTE FOR DECORA COVER PLATE
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/010,708
  • Requested Date: Sep. 23, 2009
  • Owners of Record: Arlington Industries, Inc., Scranton, PA
  • Requester: Mark E. Scott, Conley Rose, PC., Austin, TX 

No. 4,827,226

  • Title: FULLY INTEGRATED, ADJUSTABLE OSCILLATOR FOR USE WITH A CRYSTAL
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/010,687
  • Requested Date: Oct. 13, 2009
  • Owners of Record: CTS Corporation, Elkhart, IN
  • Requester: Skyworks Solutions, Inc., Woburn, MA, Steve Mendelsohn, Mendelsohn Drucker & Associates, PC., Philadelphia, PA 

No. 5,825,449

  • Title: LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE AND A METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/009,550
  • Requested Date: Sep. 17, 2009
  • Owners of Record: LG Display Co., LTD., Seoul, Korea
  • Requester: Billy C. Allen III, Wong Cabello Lutsch Rutherford & Brucculeri, LLP., Houston, TX 

No. 6,118,480

  • Title: METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR INTEGRATING A DIGITAL CAMERA USERINTERFACE ACROSS MULTIPLE OPERATING MODES
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/010,673
  • Requested Date: Oct. 19, 2009
  • Owners of Record: FlashPoint Technology, Inc., San Jose, CA
  • Requester: Steven T. Snyder, King & Spalding, LLP., New York, NY 

No. 6,177,956

  • Title: SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CORRELATING PROCESSING DATA AND IMAGE DATA WITHIN A DIGITAL CAMERA DEVICE
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/010,674
  • Requested Date: Oct. 02, 2009
  • Owners of Record: FlashPoint Technology, Inc., San Jose, CA
  • Requester: Steven T. Snyder, King & Spalding, LLP., New York, NY

No. 6,327,142

  • Title: PORTABLE COMPUTING DEVICE WITH LEATHER GRAIN TOP
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/009,540
  • Requested Date: Sep. 17, 2009
  • Owners of Record: Spanish Leather, LLC., Palm Beach Gardens, FL
  • Requester: Dell, Inc., Andrea E. Tran, Pramudji Wendt & Tran, LLP., Houston, TX

No. 6,400,471

  • Title: FLEXIBLE ARCHITECTURE FOR IMAGE PROCESSING
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/010,676
  • Requested Date: Oct. 02, 2009
  • Owners of Record: FlashPoint Technology, Inc., San Jose, CA
  • Requester: Steven T. Snyder, King & Spalding, LLP., New York, NY 

No. 6,486,914

  • Title: METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CONTROLLING USER INTERACTION IN A DIGITAL IMAGING DEVICE USING DYNAMIC OVERLAY BARS
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/010,675
  • Requested Date: Oct. 02, 2009
  • Owners of Record: FlashPoint Technology, Inc., San Jose, CA
  • Requester: Steven T. Snyder, King & Spalding, LLP., New York, NY 

No. 6,504,575

  • Title: METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DISPLAYING OVERLAY BARS IN A DIGITALIMAGING DEVICE
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/010,677
  • Requested Date: Oct. 02, 2009
  • Owners of Record: FlashPoint Technology, Inc., San Jose, CA
  • Requester: Steven T. Snyder, King & Spalding, LLP., New York, NY 

No. 6,775,130

  • Title: PORTABLE COMPUTING DEVICE WITH LEATHER GRAIN
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/009,605
  • Requested Date: Oct. 19, 2009
  • Owners of Record: Spanish Leather, LLC., Palm Beach Gardens, FL
  • Requester: Dell, Inc., Andrea E. Tran, Pramudji Wendt & Tran, LLP., Houston, TX

No. 7,402,095

  • Title: METHOD FOR REMOVING TRIP HAZARDS IN CONCRETE SIDEWALKS
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/010,691
  • Requested Date: Oct. 06, 2009
  • Owners of Record: Precision Concrete Cutting, Inc., Provo, UT
  • Requester: Karl R. Cannon, Clayton Howarth & Cannon, PC., Sandy, UT

No. 7,510,299

  • Title: LED LIGHTING DEVICE FOR REPLACING FLOURESCENT TUBES
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/010,644
  • Requested Date: Oct. 16, 2009
  • Owners of Record: Altair Engineering, Inc., Troy, MI
  • Requester: Patent Owner 

No. 7,533,740

  • Title: THERMALLY STABLE POLYCRYSTALLINE DIAMOND CUTTING ELEMENTSAND BITS INCORPORATING THE SAME
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/009,607
  • Requested Date: Oct. 13, 2009
  • Owners of Record: Smith International, Inc., Houston, TX
  • Requester: Patent Owner 

No. 5,209,571

  • Title: DEVICE FOR MEASURING THE TEMPERATURE OF A MOLTEN METAL
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/010,704
  • Requested Date: Oct. 01, 2009
  • Owners of Record: Heraeus Electro-Nite Co., Langhorne, PA
  • Requester: Vesuvius USA Corp., Pittsburgh, PA 

No. 5,388,908

  • Title: APPARATUS FOR MEASURING THE TEMPERATURE OF MOLTEN METALS
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/010,703
  • Requested Date: Oct. 01, 2009
  • Owners of Record: Heraeus Electro-Nite Co., Langhorne, PA
  • Requester: Vesuvius USA Corp., Pittsburgh, PA 

No. 5,414,811

  • Title: METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING RAPID DISPLAY OF MULTIPLE IMAGES FROM A DIGITAL IMAGE DATABASE
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/009,590
  • Requested Date: Oct. 02, 2009
  • Owners of Record: Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, NY
  • Requester: David M. Quinlan, Princeton, NJ 

5,753,506

  • Title: ISOLATION PROPAGATION AND DIRECTED DIFFERENTIATION OF STEMCELLS FROM EMBRYONIC AND ADULT CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM OF MAMMALS
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/009,567
  • Requested Date: Sep. 02, 2009
  • Owners of Record: Neuralstem, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD
  • Requester: Ivor R. Elrifi, Esq., Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo, PC., Boston, MA

No. 5,899,052

  • Title: HIGH HARDNESS BORON STEEL ROTARY BLADE
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/010,706
  • Requested Date: Oct. 02, 2009
  • Owners of Record: Fisher Barton Blades, Inc., Watertown, WI
  • Requester: Christopher J. Lewis, Schwabe Williamson & Wyatt, Portland, OR 

No. 5,910,088

  • Title: AIR INFILTRATION PREVENTION IN BUILDINGS
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/009,596
  • Requested Date: Sep. 24, 2009
  • Owners of Record: Lawrence L. Staples, St. Louis, MO
  • Requester: Johns Manville, Inc., Denver, CO 

No. 5,916,114

  • Title: HIGH HARDNESS BORON STEEL ROTARY BLADE
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/010,705
  • Requested Date: Oct. 02, 2009
  • Owners of Record: Fisher Barton Blades, Inc., Watertown, WI
  • Requester: Christopher J. Lewis, Schwabe Williamson & Wyatt, Portland, OR 

No. 6,025,774

  • Title: METHOD FOR RETRIEVING VEHICULAR COLLATERAL
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/010,660
  • Requested Date: Sep. 23, 2009
  • Owners of Record: Calamp Datacom, Inc., Oxnard, CA
  • Requester: Michael D. Stein, Woodcock Washburn, LLP., Philadelphia, PA 

No. 6,048,923

  • Title: NOVEL ELASTOMER COMPOSITES METHOD AND APPARATUS
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/010,658
  • Requested Date: Sep. 22, 2009
  • Owners of Record: Cabot Corporation, Boston, MA
  • Requester: Christopher W. Brown, Oliff & Berridge, PLC., Alexandria, VA

No. 6,237,275

  • Title: ARTIFICIAL BAIT STRUCTURE
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/009,566
  • Requested Date: Oct. 16, 2009
  • Owners of Record: Zoom Bait Company, Inc., Bogart, GA
  • Requester: Lance G. Johnson, Roylance Abrams Berdo & Goodman, LLP., Washington, DC

No. 6,249,217

  • Title: METHOD FOR RETRIEVING VEHICULAR COLLATERAL
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/010,661
  • Requested Date: Sep. 23, 2009
  • Owners of Record: Calamp Datacom, Inc., Oxnard, CA
  • Requester: David M. Platz, Woodcock Washburn, LLP., Philadelphia, PA

No. 6,410,278

  • Title: PROCESS FOR SYNTHESIZING NUCLEIC ACID
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/010,702
  • Requested Date: Oct. 01, 2009
  • Owners of Record: Eiken Kagaku Kabushiki Kaisha, Tokyo, Japan
  • Requester: Robert M. Schulman, Hunton & Williams, LLP., Washington, DC 

No. 6,590,656

  • Title: SPECTROSCOPIC SCATTEROMETER SYSTEM
  • Reexam. C.N. 90/010,659
  • Requested Date: Sep. 21, 2009
  • Owners of Record: KLA-Tencor Technologies, Corporation, Milpitas, CA
  • Requester: Michael J. Halbert, Silicon Valley Patent Group, LLP., Saratoga, CA 

 

View Recently Reported Requests for Ex Parte Reexamination Archives

Return to Top

Copyright © Ashe, P.C.